Syria After the Fall of Assad: New Prospects in Foreign Policy and Strategic Transformations

One year after the fall of the former regime, the country is witnessing a profound political transformation that is reshaping the balance of power both domestically and regionally. This transformation is more than a mere change of faces in power; it represents the collapse of a governance model that lasted for decades, relying on security alliances and exclusion.

Transition to a Pragmatic Policy

Attention is now turning to the necessity of moving Syria away from rigid regional blocs and toward a new foreign policy based on pragmatism and balance. Following the fall of the regime, Syria under the transitional authority shifted toward the Western–American axis, granting it new opportunities to engage with international and regional powers.

Analysis of Dmitry Brij’

Russian political analyst Dmitry Brij’ considers that the fall of the regime was not just the end of a historical stage, but a political earthquake that reshaped the balance of power. He points out that this moment requires a deep reading of the international landscape, as Syria needs genuine openness to the United States and Europe in order to lift sanctions and revive the economy.

Complexities in International Relations

Brij’ believes the situation is more complex than a mere shift between political blocs, noting that the roles of Russia, Iran, and Turkey in matters of security, borders, and energy cannot be overlooked. Foreign relations must be built on clear national interests that align with the economic and social realities.

Balance Among Powers

For his part, Syrian political analyst Samir Abu Saleh highlights the importance of major powers supporting smaller states. He considers the Syrian transformation a reflection of the revolutionary vision, while emphasizing the importance of independent national decision-making within the context of international relations.

Future Challenges

Brij’ underlines that this task is not easy, but it is the only path toward building true independence in Syrian decision-making. If the new elites succeed in reinforcing the logic of balance, Syria will be able to redefine its role as a truly sovereign state. However, if the logic of political blocs continues, the country will remain vulnerable to recurring crises.

Conclusion

The current transformations in Syria reflect an effort to achieve independence in national decision-making while emphasizing the need to strike a balance in foreign relations. The political landscape remains complex and requires new strategies to safeguard the country’s supreme interests—potentially opening new horizons for Syria’s future.